Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

RE: [INTERFACES] Last best version of the JDBC Driver?

From: Hakan Tandogan <hakan42(at)gmx(dot)de>
To: Peter Mount <petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] Last best version of the JDBC Driver?
Date: 2000-02-22 17:18:24
Message-ID: 00022218230105.10757@taubnessel.pcp.local (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces
On Tue, 22 Feb 2000, you wrote:
> The one in CVS is the one that should have been 6.5.3.
> 
> However, I do have at home the one that should be for 7.0. However due
> to problems here (like a network that keeps dying on me, and other nice
> little problems), I've not finished it yet into a state that can be
> included into CVS.

	Will those changes be in 7.0 final or is the "feature freeze" already
in effect? If you want, I'd be delighted to test pre-releases of your 7.0
driver.

	BTW, did you read my other mail about BINARY field types? Any chance
that 7.0 could help me with that problem? For example, the LO type could be
reported as BINARY...

	Regards,
		Hakan

 -- 
Hakan Tandogan                                       hakan(at)iconsult(dot)com

ICONSULT Tandogan - Egerer GbR                   Tel.: +49-9131-9047-0
Memelstrasse 38 - D-91052 Erlangen               Fax.: +49-9131-9047-77

"Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature"

In response to

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Ken J. WrightDate: 2000-02-22 21:09:08
Subject: pg_pwd problem, 2nd try
Previous:From: Peter MountDate: 2000-02-22 16:39:03
Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] Last best version of the JDBC Driver?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group