RE: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Last call?

From: "Taral" <taral(at)mail(dot)utexas(dot)edu>
To: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, "Terry Mackintosh" <terry(at)terrym(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL-development" <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Last call?
Date: 1998-10-25 18:15:15
Message-ID: 000001be0043$6a470280$3b291f0a@taral
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I compiled it on RH 5.1... no problems.

Taral

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
> [mailto:owner-pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org]On Behalf Of Thomas G.
> Lockhart
> Sent: Sunday, October 25, 1998 12:08 PM
> To: Terry Mackintosh; PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Last call?
>
>
> > > 'Linux ix86' had an '_', or unknown
> > Thanks Terry, but I've already got that one done
>
> But Oliver was asking about glibc2 vs libc5. Do you happen to have a
> glibc machine (RH 5.x?) available? If so we could use a direct report of
> success since I'm still running RH4.2/libc5 for development...
>
> - Tom
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Egon Schmid 1998-10-25 18:19:39 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Last call?
Previous Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1998-10-25 18:07:59 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Last call?