Re: BUG #15977: Inconsistent behavior in chained transactions

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: fn ln <emuser20140816(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #15977: Inconsistent behavior in chained transactions
Date: 2019-08-29 12:10:06
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.21.1908291406200.28828@lancre
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers


Hello,

> Added two kinds of test for the implicit transaction: in single query and
> in implicit block.

Ok.

> The patch file is now created with Unix-style line ending (LF).

Thanks.

Patch applies and compiles cleanly. However, "make check" is not ok
on the added tests.

SHOW transaction_read_only;
transaction_read_only
-----------------------
- on
+ off

ISTM that the run is right and the patch test output is wrong, i.e. the
transaction_read_only is expected to stay as is.

--
Fabien.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message fn ln 2019-08-29 12:35:43 Re: BUG #15977: Inconsistent behavior in chained transactions
Previous Message fn ln 2019-08-29 11:39:39 Re: BUG #15977: Inconsistent behavior in chained transactions

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Anastasia Lubennikova 2019-08-29 12:13:39 Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Effective storage of duplicates in B-tree index.
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2019-08-29 12:09:33 Re: Zedstore - compressed in-core columnar storage