Re: BUG #15493: Wrong name of fields/missing fields for the internal statistic

From: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: frank(dot)buettner(at)mdc-berlin(dot)de, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #15493: Wrong name of fields/missing fields for the internal statistic
Date: 2018-11-08 14:37:14
Message-ID: CAMkU=1yM9O0fFKtWRBYKYMAJieKY3Lt7NEzeWg5s0uMVVmRJ-w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 9:12 AM PG Bug reporting form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org>
wrote:

> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
> Bug reference: 15493
> Logged by: - -
> Email address: frank(dot)buettner(at)mdc-berlin(dot)de
> PostgreSQL version: 11.0
> Operating system: CentOS 7.5
> Description:
>
> How to produce:
> - Simple install pgsql 11 on CentOS from yum repo of postgresql.org
> - init the cluster
> - start the server
> - wait some time
>

The query you show is not executed merely due to the passage of time.
Something is executing that query. It is probably a monitoring tool.

Since procpid was removed back in version 9.2, the monitoring tools seems
massively out of date. It is possible this tool has buggy code to detect
the version, and concludes that v11 is prior to 9.2. But that seems
unlikely to be broken by v11 but not by v10. Do you have the same problem
in v10?

Figure out what your monitoring tool is and report the bug to its
maintainer.

Cheers,

Jeff

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-11-08 14:48:11 Re: BUG #15493: Wrong name of fields/missing fields for the internal statistic
Previous Message PG Bug reporting form 2018-11-08 14:11:14 BUG #15493: Wrong name of fields/missing fields for the internal statistic