Re: BUG #15610: Performance problem of PostgreSQL 11.1 Windowsversion (EDB created version)

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Toshi Harada <harada(dot)toshi(at)po(dot)ntt-tx(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #15610: Performance problem of PostgreSQL 11.1 Windowsversion (EDB created version)
Date: 2019-01-30 05:16:14
Message-ID: CAKJS1f8SbYhB=aQ6nsJdEk=uOCqGzyfC-8nnOG9ahLVORa4BFQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 at 18:08, Toshi Harada <harada(dot)toshi(at)po(dot)ntt-tx(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> explain_bigsql_11.1.txt explain analyze log.
> explain_edb_10.6.txt explain analyze log.
> explain_edb_11.0.txt explain analyze log.
> select_model.sql explain analyze statement.
> settings_bigsql_11.1 BigSQL 11 configuration.
> settings_diff.txt EDB 11 and BigSQL 11 diff
> settings_edb_10.6 EDB 10 configuration.
> settings_edb_11.1 EDB 11 configuration.

Most likely down to the collation being C on the EDB versions and
Japanese_Japan.932 on the bigsql one.

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-01-30 05:21:40 Re: BUG #15609: synchronous_commit=off insert performance regression with secondary indexes
Previous Message Toshi Harada 2019-01-30 05:06:29 Re: BUG #15610: Performance problem of PostgreSQL 11.1 Windowsversion (EDB created version)