| From: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Ash M <makmarath(at)hotmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #15572: Misleading message reported by "Drop function operation" on DB with functions having same name |
| Date: | 2019-02-19 20:57:19 |
| Message-ID: | CAKJS1f-N9NC7K41fRwgRyHEUiBbOLB_Lmhsfu8AnHt2=ZkqBoQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 at 09:20, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 9:04 PM David Rowley
> <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > I think since the original argument was a bool then it's pretty
> > unlikely that such an assert would ever catch anything, given 0 and 1
> > are both valid values for this enum type.
>
> Indeed. It looks all fine to me in v6, so I'm marking the patch as
> ready for committer.
Great. Thanks for reviewing it.
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-02-19 21:51:46 | Re: BUG #15643: Problem using PGAdmin 4.2 to connect to postrgres hot standby |
| Previous Message | PG Bug reporting form | 2019-02-19 20:46:19 | BUG #15643: Problem using PGAdmin 4.2 to connect to postrgres hot standby |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-02-19 20:57:53 | Re: speeding up planning with partitions |
| Previous Message | David Rowley | 2019-02-19 20:56:18 | Re: WAL insert delay settings |