| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | deathlock13(at)gmail(dot)com, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #15309: ERROR: catalog is missing 1 attribute(s) for relid 760676 when max_parallel_maintenance_workers > 0 |
| Date: | 2018-08-09 17:58:55 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-Wzk6tjnFi7vEXJdY7jj9cLs8qar0iXVvAAyTyMg+ZFtSrA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 10:34 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I took a quick look at these. The v11 patch seems OK as far as it goes,
> but I wonder if you shouldn't also include the RelationMapUpdateMap
> hunk from the master patch, ie adding rejection of map changes in parallel
> mode.
Good idea. I'll do that.
> I don't have any objection to the master patch, but it'd be good to get
> a +1 from someone who's spent more time with the parallelism
> infrastructure than I have.
That would be my preference too, but commit 29d58fd3 is very analogous
to the proposed master branch fix, so I feel that it's reasonable to
proceed without final approval from someone like Robert or Amit. I'll
leave pushing until late in the day tomorrow, pacific time.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | PG Bug reporting form | 2018-08-10 02:00:56 | BUG #15320: = any (array(SQL)) ERROR: invalid memory alloc request size 1073741824 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-08-09 17:34:21 | Re: BUG #15309: ERROR: catalog is missing 1 attribute(s) for relid 760676 when max_parallel_maintenance_workers > 0 |