From: | Alisher Aliev <allyanaliev(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, "pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #15692: infinity loop |
Date: | 2019-03-13 12:57:43 |
Message-ID: | CADujpMdwM0x9nCY_wweBHXCi6tBLoMxEJ+8PPVyj_w_HvCDUTg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Thanks for replying
On Wed, 13 Mar 2019, 14:43 Dean Rasheed, <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 at 11:04, Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org> wrote:
> >
> > > At last command PostgreSQL comming inside infinity loop.
> >
> > I have message "ERROR: value overflows numeric format" very quickly for
> both 11.2 and HEAD versions.
> >
>
> Yeah, in any modern Postgres (9.6 or later) this calculation fails
> with a numeric overflow in less than a millisecond for me. That's
> consistent with the fact that numeric calculations were improved
> somewhat in 9.6.
>
> In older versions (9.0 - 9.5 inclusive), which includes 4 old
> unsupported versions, it takes a little over a second to fail.
> Certainly not an "infinity loop".
>
> In really old versions (I tested 8.3 and 8.4) it does indeed appear to
> go into an near-infinite loop, but frankly, anyone running 8.4 or
> older has bigger problems.
>
> Regards,
> Dean
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-03-13 13:54:55 | Re: BUG #15691: ERROR: XX000: cannot update SecondarySnapshot during a parallel operation |
Previous Message | Dean Rasheed | 2019-03-13 12:43:11 | Re: BUG #15692: infinity loop |