Re: BUG #16402: No se puede instalar pgadmin4

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: ezequieldavids(at)gmail(dot)com, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #16402: No se puede instalar pgadmin4
Date: 2020-04-29 23:11:27
Message-ID: CA+hUKGKOZWBKFZSaQKPYt1kARhGxy1f_OR2-57aygPWsXo=8jQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 3:32 AM PG Bug reporting form
<noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> Des:7 http://apt.postgresql.org/pub/repos/apt focal-pgdg/main amd64 Packages
> [142 kB]
> Descargados 199 kB en 6s (31,9 kB/s)
>
>
>
> Leyendo lista de paquetes... Hecho
> N: Omitiendo el uso del fichero configurado «main/binary-i386/Packages» ya
> que el repositorio «http://apt.postgresql.org/pub/repos/apt focal-pgdg
> InRelease» no admite la arquitectura «i386»

So the question is really: why don't we have i386 packages for Ubuntu
focal? I don't know myself and https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Apt
doesn't mention any policy on that, but maybe someone from the
packaging team could comment, and if you don't get an answer here then
maybe the packaging mailing list or contacts on that wiki page could
help.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2020-04-30 00:03:49 Re: BUG #16402: No se puede instalar pgadmin4
Previous Message PG Bug reporting form 2020-04-29 21:50:53 BUG #16403: set_bit function does not have expected effect