| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, Christophe Pettus <christophe(dot)pettus(at)pgexperts(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use? |
| Date: | 2017-09-26 22:04:26 |
| Message-ID: | 5161729c-4597-8a41-f4e2-c7d97e84d86e@2ndQuadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On 09/26/2017 05:45 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
>
> I've not been following along very closely- are we sure that ripping
> this out won't be worse than dealing with it in-place? Will pulling it
> out also require a post-RC1 catversion bump?
>
>
It shouldn't do AFAIK - the function signatures weren't changed.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2017-09-26 22:18:53 | Re: [HACKERS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2017-09-26 21:46:18 | Re: [HACKERS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2017-09-26 22:15:39 | Re: v10 pg_ctl compatibility |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2017-09-26 21:46:18 | Re: [HACKERS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use? |