Re: BUG #16036: Segmentation fault while doing an update

Tried only two concurrent queries and crash is still present, so it’s not about total query count.

> 4 окт. 2019 г., в 4:24, Антон Власов <druidvav(at)gmail(dot)com> написал(а):
>
> Hello,
>
> This test script always causes a crash:
>
> postgres(at)gp-app01:~$ cat test.sh
> psql -d gdeposylka -c "update tracking.test_session set list_position = list_position + 1 where id = 85638;" &
> psql -d gdeposylka -c "update tracking.test_session set list_position = list_position + 1 where id = 85638;" &
> psql -d gdeposylka -c "update tracking.test_session set list_position = list_position + 1 where id = 85638;" &
> psql -d gdeposylka -c "update tracking.test_session set list_position = list_position + 1 where id = 85638;" &
> psql -d gdeposylka -c "update tracking.test_session set list_position = list_position + 1 where id = 85638;" &
> psql -d gdeposylka -c "update tracking.test_session set list_position = list_position + 1 where id = 85638;" &
> psql -d gdeposylka -c "update tracking.test_session set list_position = list_position + 1 where id = 85638;" &
>
> create table tracking.test_result
> (
> id serial not null
> constraint test_result_pkey
> primary key,
> session_id integer
> constraint test_result_session_id_fkey
> references tracking.test_session,
> reported_at timestamp(0) default now(),
> courier varchar(25) not null,
> tracking_number varchar(60) not null,
> status varchar(25) not null,
> fail_combo integer default 0 not null,
> response_test text,
> response_real text,
> response_time real,
> code smallint,
> message text,
> retry integer
> );
>
> create index test_result_session_id_idx
> on tracking.test_result (session_id);
>
> Didn’t finish isolating bug from my database so i’m not sure if it work out for you. Single queries work as usual, only concurrent ones cause crash.
>
>
>> 4 окт. 2019 г., в 4:20, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> написал(а):
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On October 3, 2019 6:14:33 PM PDT, "Антон Власов" <druidvav(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Looks like disabling jit didn’t affect backtrace at all:
>>>
>>> 0 GetMemoryChunkContext (pointer=0x0) at
>>> ./build/../src/include/utils/memutils.h:127
>>> #1 pfree (pointer=0x0) at
>>> ./build/../src/backend/utils/mmgr/mcxt.c:1033
>>> #2 0x0000555d7276aaca in heap_freetuple (htup=<optimized out>) at
>>> ./build/../src/backend/access/common/heaptuple.c:1340
>>> #3 0x0000555d72918889 in tts_buffer_heap_clear (slot=0x555d73dbb118)
>>> at ./build/../src/backend/executor/execTuples.c:652
>>> #4 0x0000555d72918cbe in ExecClearTuple (slot=0x555d73dbb118) at
>>> ./build/../src/include/executor/tuptable.h:428
>>> #5 ExecResetTupleTable (tupleTable=0x555d73db5a10, shouldFree=false)
>>
>> That's good - I was only looking at that because of the truncated backtrace. Did you do anything to make that work better this time?
>>
>> Are there any details that you can provide? Schema? Any extensions in use?
>>
>> Does the problem happen always, or just under concurrency?
>>
>> Andres
>> --
>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>