Re: BUG #16293: postgres segfaults and returns SQLSTATE 08006

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: dwilches(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #16293: postgres segfaults and returns SQLSTATE 08006
Date: 2020-03-10 22:19:51
Message-ID: 28203.1583878791@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

PG Bug reporting form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> I finally found the issue was that one of the tests was trying to insert a
> row on a partitioned table, but there was no partition where to put that
> row, so it had to go to the default partition. But, the default partition
> had a constraint that disallowed that row, so the row couldn't be inserted
> and Postgres ended with a segfault.

Hm, works for me:

regression=# create table tt (f1 int, f2 text) partition by list(f1);
CREATE TABLE
regression=# create table t1 partition of tt for values in (1);
CREATE TABLE
regression=# create table tother partition of tt default;
CREATE TABLE
regression=# alter table tother add check (length(f2) > 1);
ALTER TABLE
regression=# insert into tt values (1, 'f');
INSERT 0 1
regression=# insert into tt values (3, 'f');
ERROR: new row for relation "tother" violates check constraint "tother_f2_check"
DETAIL: Failing row contains (3, f).
regression=#

Admittedly this is v11 branch tip not exactly 11.7, but I don't see
anything related-looking in the commit log. So I think there is some
contributing factor you didn't mention. Could you provide a
self-contained reproduction script?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel WM 2020-03-10 23:04:48 Re: BUG #16293: postgres segfaults and returns SQLSTATE 08006
Previous Message PG Bug reporting form 2020-03-10 21:13:24 BUG #16293: postgres segfaults and returns SQLSTATE 08006