Re: BUG #15796: [not a bug actually] vacuumlo - its name is confusing

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: taem(at)linukz(dot)org, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #15796: [not a bug actually] vacuumlo - its name is confusing
Date: 2019-05-08 13:25:50
Message-ID: 23675.1557321950@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 09:52:33AM +0000, PG Bug reporting form wrote:
>> I think vacuumlo's name is confusing, especially for newbies. As we know,
>> vacuumlo's purpose is to remove orphaned large objects, not to vacuum
>> them.
>> Is it possible to rename this utility? I am sorry, if it is already
>> discussed.

> The tool is old enough to vote (94bb87f from 1999), and holds this
> name since its birth. So a renaming may be more annoying than
> anything else I am afraid.

Yeah, the backwards-compatibility hit seems rather disproportionate
to the value of a change.

Also, I'm not really convinced that a name change would be much of
an improvement. Zapping unreferenced large objects is sort of like
what VACUUM does, if you aren't too picky about details ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Monica Maria Piza Merchan 2019-05-08 16:03:29 prerunscript.command.line.error
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-05-08 13:14:59 Re: BUG #15796: [not a bug actually] vacuumlo - its name is confusing