| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Yuli Khodorkovskiy <yuli(dot)khodorkovskiy(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #15804: Assertion failure when using logging_collector with EXEC_BACKEND |
| Date: | 2019-05-19 15:05:22 |
| Message-ID: | 22995.1558278322@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> Thanks for confirming. There is little time for doing the revert, and
> it would have been nice seeing comments from Peter. Anyway, I should
> be able to do that myself in 24 hours or so after coming back in
> front of my desk so as the buildfarm can have a couple of cycles for
> its work. If you prefer doing that yourself, that's of course fine by
> me.
I'm going to push this revert in a few minutes (as soon as I get done
with local sanity testing). At this point, an extra 8 or 10 hours
makes a significant difference in how many of the slower buildfarm
critters will have reported in by Monday.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-05-19 16:09:41 | Re: BUG #15804: Assertion failure when using logging_collector with EXEC_BACKEND |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2019-05-19 02:10:43 | Re: BUG #15804: Assertion failure when using logging_collector with EXEC_BACKEND |