Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs. address/IP-address/IP-mask fields

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: tureba(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs. address/IP-address/IP-mask fields
Date: 2020-05-26 02:07:49
Message-ID: 20200526020749.GH14122@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 08:26:47PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 06:29:31PM +0000, PG Bug reporting form wrote:
> > 1. Near the top, there's a line saying "A record can have one of the seven
> > formats", then the followup list shows 9 formats.
>
> Thanks for pointing it out; it was also mentioned here:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20200505104507.GA32455%40gate.oper.dinoex.org
> So I'd included it it in my "docs" patch to resend someday.

Yes, that was fixed in my patch.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrey Klychkov 2020-05-26 09:49:32
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2020-05-26 01:41:36 Re: logical replication: could not create file "state.tmp": File exists