Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs. address/IP-address/IP-mask fields

From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
To: tureba(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs. address/IP-address/IP-mask fields
Date: 2020-05-26 01:26:47
Message-ID: 20200526012647.GV4472@telsasoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 06:29:31PM +0000, PG Bug reporting form wrote:
> 1. Near the top, there's a line saying "A record can have one of the seven
> formats", then the followup list shows 9 formats.

Thanks for pointing it out; it was also mentioned here:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20200505104507.GA32455%40gate.oper.dinoex.org
So I'd included it it in my "docs" patch to resend someday.

--
Justin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2020-05-26 01:41:36 Re: logical replication: could not create file "state.tmp": File exists
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2020-05-26 00:38:49 Re: BUG #16460: Error when executing REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW WITH DATA;