| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Ben Cornett <ben(at)lantern(dot)is> |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #16112: large, unexpected memory consumption |
| Date: | 2020-04-20 18:55:30 |
| Message-ID: | 20200420185530.kcecu5vafc3icnhk@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Hi,
On 2020-04-11 20:35:52 +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 08:21:54AM -0400, Ben Cornett wrote:
Ben, for the future, it's better to not drop CC addresses etc. I didn't
see this reply at the time you sent it, just when I was catching up on
my backlog of unread postgres email.
> > Did this patch ever get applied? It is not clear to me that it did.
No :(. I lost track of it. I did recall that there was some patch I was
supposed to get back to, but couldn't remember what exactly :(.
It's really too bad that we don't have a bugtracker. I just can't keep
track of all bugs / patches where I e.g. want to wait a few days for a
reply (here to see whether Tom likes my alternative context based
approach).
> Hmmm, I don't think it got applied, which means we've missed yet another
> minor release :-(
>
> Andres, any plans to push this?
Yea, I think I'll go for my alternative approach from
https://postgr.es/m/20191115024707.y5bcsb4oo4wzovu4%40alap3.anarazel.de
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-04-20 19:19:13 | Re: BUG #16112: large, unexpected memory consumption |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-04-20 18:48:00 | Re: BUG #16378: Invalid memory access on interrupting CLUSTER after CREATE TEMP TABLE |