Re: BUG #16241: Degraded hash join performance

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Thomas Butz <tbutz(at)optitool(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #16241: Degraded hash join performance
Date: 2020-02-04 15:01:52
Message-ID: 20200204150152.prebesyfo2idnyum@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Hi,

On 2020-02-04 15:49:10 +0100, Thomas Butz wrote:
> I was able to reduce it to a minimal example:
>
> SELECT localized_streetname
> FROM planet_osm_line
> WHERE "way" && ST_SetSRID('BOX3D(1222380.956336539 6339381.37785938,1233387.888409604 6350388.309932444)'::box3d, 3857)
>
> Your diagnosis with osml10n_get_streetname_from_tags was spot on. I'm going to report it to the author of the osml10n extension.

Cool. Still worth checking whether there's a 11 vs 12 issue inside that function.

> Thank you for your help!
>
> PS: I've created the execution plans using EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, VERBOSE, COSTS, BUFFERS, TIMING, SUMMARY, FORMAT json) but i wasn't aware that i might have to check the "Output" section of a node to find potential performance problems. How do you find such slow outputs without using perf?

It's not trivial, unfortunately :(. You can use track_functions to get
more insight, but that's better for server-wide analysis, than query
specific ones. auto_explain also has options to track nested queries,
which might help as well.

I hope we can extend EXPLAIN with more information about this kind of
thing at some point.

Regards,

Andres

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-02-04 16:00:29 Re: BUG #16241: Degraded hash join performance
Previous Message Thomas Butz 2020-02-04 14:49:10 Re: BUG #16241: Degraded hash join performance