Re: BUG #16104: Invalid DSA Memory Alloc Request in Parallel Hash

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #16104: Invalid DSA Memory Alloc Request in Parallel Hash
Date: 2019-12-10 17:35:16
Message-ID: 20191210173516.GA10987@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On 2019-Dec-10, Tomas Vondra wrote:

> It's probably still a good idea to do this, although I wonder if we
> might start doing this only when actually running out of bits (and use
> the current algorithm by default). But I have no idea if that would be
> any cheaper, and it would add complexity.

I'm under the impression that this patch is proposed for backpatching,
and that in master we can simply increase the hash width.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-12-10 18:24:10 Re: BUG #16154: pg_ctl restart with a logfile fails sometimes (on Windows)
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2019-12-10 17:32:24 Re: BUG #16104: Invalid DSA Memory Alloc Request in Parallel Hash