Re: BUG #15323: wal_keep_segments must be >= 1 for WAL archiving + streaming to work

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Phil Endecott <spam_from_pgsql_lists(at)chezphil(dot)org>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #15323: wal_keep_segments must be >= 1 for WAL archiving + streaming to work
Date: 2018-08-13 15:22:11
Message-ID: 20180813152211.GN3326@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Greetings,

* Andres Freund (andres(at)anarazel(dot)de) wrote:
> On August 13, 2018 4:59:32 PM GMT+02:00, Phil Endecott <spam_from_pgsql_lists(at)chezphil(dot)org> wrote:
> but in general, I think it's still
> >possible
> >that the master will remove the segment that is needed to start
> >streaming.
>
> That's why I told you about replication slots....

This should really work even without replication slots though.

Thanks!

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-08-13 15:27:12 Re: BUG #15323: wal_keep_segments must be >= 1 for WAL archiving + streaming to work
Previous Message Andres Freund 2018-08-13 15:02:00 Re: BUG #15323: wal_keep_segments must be >= 1 for WAL archiving + streaming to work