| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, Christophe Pettus <christophe(dot)pettus(at)pgexperts(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use? |
| Date: | 2017-09-26 21:32:15 |
| Message-ID: | 16025.1506461535@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 04:07:02PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Any other votes out there?
> Well, I was concerned yesterday that we had a broken build farm so close
> to release. (I got consistent regression failures.) I think PG 11 would
> be better for this feature change, so I support reverting this.
I'll take the blame for (most of) yesterday's failures in the v10
branch, but they were unrelated to this patch --- they were because
of that SIGBUS patch I messed up. So that doesn't seem like a very
applicable argument. Still, it's true that this seems like the most
consequential patch that's gone into v10 post-RC1, certainly so if
you discount stuff that was back-patched further than v10.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2017-09-26 21:45:48 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use? |
| Previous Message | Fabrízio de Royes Mello | 2017-09-26 21:23:37 | Re: BUG #14827: "ALTER TABLE... IF NOT EXISTS...ADD.. BIGSERIAL" leaves extra sequences |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomasz Ostrowski | 2017-09-26 21:41:15 | Multicolumn hash indexes |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2017-09-26 21:14:19 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use? |