Re: BUG #16112: large, unexpected memory consumption

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Ben Cornett <ben(at)lantern(dot)is>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #16112: large, unexpected memory consumption
Date: 2020-04-20 19:19:13
Message-ID: 12915.1587410353@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> It's really too bad that we don't have a bugtracker. I just can't keep
> track of all bugs / patches where I e.g. want to wait a few days for a
> reply (here to see whether Tom likes my alternative context based
> approach).

> Yea, I think I'll go for my alternative approach from
> https://postgr.es/m/20191115024707.y5bcsb4oo4wzovu4%40alap3.anarazel.de

I haven't done any testing, but it looks reasonable.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Muehlhausen 2020-04-20 19:32:05 Re: NOTIFY in multi-statement PQexec() not sent outside of transaction
Previous Message Andres Freund 2020-04-20 18:55:30 Re: BUG #16112: large, unexpected memory consumption