Re: 9.6 Feature help requested: Inclusion Constraints

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 9.6 Feature help requested: Inclusion Constraints
Date: 2015-02-11 02:47:22
Message-ID: 54DAC2BA.40205@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2/9/15 3:12 AM, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-02-07 at 16:08 -0800, Jeff Davis wrote:
>> I believe Inclusion Constraints will be important for postgres.
>
> I forgot to credit Darren Duncan with the name of this feature:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4F8BB9B0.5090708@darrenduncan.net

I think it would be confusing to name something inclusion constraint
that is not somehow the opposite of an exclusion constraint.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2015-02-11 02:55:29 Re: reducing our reliance on MD5
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-02-11 02:38:26 Re: reducing our reliance on MD5