At 1:51 PM -0500 11/20/02, Tom Lane wrote:
>Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk> writes:
>> On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 01:21:47PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Ah-hah, so it is a version issue --- we could make the resultmap line
>>> something like
>> NetBSD/i386-1.6H i386-unknown-netbsdelf1.6H (checked 7.3rc1)
>> NetBSD/acorn32-1.6K arm-unknown-netbsdelf1.6K (still building 7.3rc1)
>Hm, is that "elf" always there? I'm a little uncomfortable with making
>the pattern be
>as this seems way too lax ...
A version like 1.6[A-Z] is a -current, not a release version from in
between 1.5.x and 1.6.
Different NetBSD ports have converted to elf at different times and
not all ports are using elf even with 1.6 released.
The opinions expressed in this message are mine,
not those of Caltech, JPL, NASA, or the US Government.
Henry(dot)B(dot)Hotz(at)jpl(dot)nasa(dot)gov, or hbhotz(at)oxy(dot)edu
In response to
pgsql-ports by date
|Next:||From: scott.marlowe||Date: 2002-11-25 21:41:53|
|Subject: Solaris still failing RC2|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2002-11-20 22:02:02|
|Subject: Re: RC1?|
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Justin Clift||Date: 2002-11-21 02:40:41|
|Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Bug with sequence|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2002-11-21 01:05:04|
|Subject: Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/runtime.sgml rc/back ...|