Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Bug in current network.c

From: darcy(at)druid(dot)net (D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain)
To: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane)
Cc: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org ('hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org')
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Bug in current network.c
Date: 1998-10-29 17:59:33
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Thus spake Tom Lane
> darcy(at)druid(dot)net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain) writes:
> > For some reason network.c reverted to an earlier version in the tree.  Your
> > patch was already submitted by someone (Bruce?) but the changes, like my
> > other changes, were lost.
> It looks like Bruce copied-and-pasted a little too much while applying
> your last patch.  I had fixed the "< 0" tests that ought to be "== NULL"
> on Sunday, but one of them was on a line that you wanted changed for other
> reasons, and it went back to being wrong...

Trust us.  We're professionals.  :-)

D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at){druid|vex}.net>   |  Democracy is three wolves                |  and a sheep voting on
+1 416 424 2871     (DoD#0082)    (eNTP)   |  what's for dinner.

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: D'Arcy J.M. CainDate: 1998-10-29 18:01:56
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/include/catalog pg_operator.h'
Previous:From: TaralDate: 1998-10-29 17:51:24
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] 6.4 BETA2 fails to compile on Digital Unix 4.0d

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group