Re: Fusion-io ioDrive

From: "Jeffrey Baker" <jwbaker(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Andrej Ricnik-Bay" <andrej(dot)groups(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fusion-io ioDrive
Date: 2008-07-02 01:36:02
Message-ID: fd145f7d0807011836y48496bd4m469f575615ae74aa@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 6:17 PM, Andrej Ricnik-Bay
<andrej(dot)groups(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On 02/07/2008, Jeffrey Baker <jwbaker(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Red Hat and its clones. The other problem is the 80GB model is too
>> small to hold my entire DB, Although it could be used as a tablespace
>> for some critical tables. But hey, it's fast.
> And when/if it dies, please give us a rough guestimate of its
> life-span in terms of read/write cycles. Sounds exciting, though!

Yeah. The manufacturer rates it for 5 years in constant use. I
remain skeptical.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2008-07-02 01:38:04 Re: Fusion-io ioDrive
Previous Message Andrej Ricnik-Bay 2008-07-02 01:17:35 Re: Fusion-io ioDrive