Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: mysql proxy

From: Lukas Kahwe Smith <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: mysql proxy
Date: 2007-08-28 15:48:41
Message-ID: fb1g4r$1dd2$ (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
> Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>> I don't care what people do with their data, especially if they're
>> using MySQL.  What I am arguing against is adding something like this
>> proxy capability to Postgres.  The reason I'm arguing against such a
>> capability is that it looks to me like an immense man in the middle
>> attack just itching to happen.  I think it's a misfeature, for that
>> reason.
> Fair enough, I now understand much better how PostgreSQL approaches 
> making similar (or better) capabilities available.

Doh, sorry for the triple post. Probably some proxy interference :)


In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Harald Armin MassaDate: 2007-08-28 15:56:50
Subject: Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Previous:From: Lukas Kahwe SmithDate: 2007-08-28 15:42:50
Subject: Re: mysql proxy

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group