From: | Francisco Reyes <lists(at)stringsutils(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jeffrey Baker <jwbaker(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Jeff <threshar(at)threshar(dot)is-a-geek(dot)com>, Pgsql performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 3ware vs Areca |
Date: | 2008-07-19 01:39:55 |
Message-ID: | cone.1216431595.291323.79328.1000@zoraida.natserv.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Jeffrey Baker writes:
> Their firmware is, frankly, garbage. In more than one instance we
> have had the card panic when a disk fails, which is obviously counter
> to the entire purpose of a RAID.
I have had simmilar problems with 3ware 9550 and 9650 cards.
Undre FreeBSD I have seen constant crashes under heavy loads.
Used to think it was just FreeBSD, but saw a thread on StorageReview where
the same was happening under Linux.
> controllers from our database server and replaced them with HP P800s.
How is that working out?
Which RAID level? SAS/SATA?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Francisco Reyes | 2008-07-19 01:45:07 | Re: An "obvious" index not being used |
Previous Message | Francisco Reyes | 2008-07-19 00:25:50 | Re: Backup/Restore of single table in multi TB database |