Re: Patches I'm thinking of pushing shortly

From: Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patches I'm thinking of pushing shortly
Date: 2017-08-13 09:02:40
Message-ID: c8483946-254b-decc-098f-b1a39168f48a@archidevsys.co.nz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 13/08/17 16:19, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 3:24 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
[...]
>
> I'd vote for including this in v10. There doesn't seem to be any
> downside to this: it's a no brainer to avoid our exploding hash table
> case when we can see it coming.
>
But explosions are fun!
< ducks, and runs away VERY rapidly>

More seriously:
Up to now I'd been avoiding hash indexes, so great news!

Cheers,
Gavin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alik Khilazhev 2017-08-13 12:13:10 Re: [WIP] Zipfian distribution in pgbench
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2017-08-13 07:21:29 Re: Pluggable storage