From c648b7f7bf2d1e3d65e0e0cb79c24ee0e3751be7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: amit Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 19:22:31 +0900 Subject: [PATCH 4/4] Teach ATExecAttachPartition to skip validation in more cases In cases where the table being attached is a partitioned table and the table itself does not have constraints that would allow validation on the whole table to be skipped, we can still skip the validations of individual partitions if they each happen to have the requisite constraints. Per an idea of Robert Haas', with code refactoring suggestions from Ashutosh Bapat. --- src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c | 198 +++++++++++++++++------------- src/test/regress/expected/alter_table.out | 12 ++ src/test/regress/sql/alter_table.sql | 11 ++ 3 files changed, 135 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c b/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c index 9fe045f3cd..a385330790 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c @@ -473,6 +473,8 @@ static void CreateInheritance(Relation child_rel, Relation parent_rel); static void RemoveInheritance(Relation child_rel, Relation parent_rel); static ObjectAddress ATExecAttachPartition(List **wqueue, Relation rel, PartitionCmd *cmd); +static bool PartConstraintImpliedByRelConstraint(Relation partrel, + List *partConstraint); static ObjectAddress ATExecDetachPartition(Relation rel, RangeVar *name); @@ -13422,15 +13424,12 @@ ATExecAttachPartition(List **wqueue, Relation rel, PartitionCmd *cmd) Relation attachrel, catalog; List *attachrel_children; - TupleConstr *attachrel_constr; - List *partConstraint, - *existConstraint; + List *partConstraint; SysScanDesc scan; ScanKeyData skey; AttrNumber attno; int natts; TupleDesc tupleDesc; - bool skip_validate = false; ObjectAddress address; const char *trigger_name; @@ -13621,88 +13620,10 @@ ATExecAttachPartition(List **wqueue, Relation rel, PartitionCmd *cmd) rel); /* - * Check if we can do away with having to scan the table being attached to - * validate the partition constraint, by *proving* that the existing - * constraints of the table *imply* the partition predicate. We include - * the table's check constraints and NOT NULL constraints in the list of - * clauses passed to predicate_implied_by(). - * - * There is a case in which we cannot rely on just the result of the - * proof. + * Based on the table's existing constraints, determine if we can skip + * scanning the table to validate the partition constraint. */ - attachrel_constr = tupleDesc->constr; - existConstraint = NIL; - if (attachrel_constr != NULL) - { - int num_check = attachrel_constr->num_check; - int i; - - if (attachrel_constr->has_not_null) - { - int natts = attachrel->rd_att->natts; - - for (i = 1; i <= natts; i++) - { - Form_pg_attribute att = attachrel->rd_att->attrs[i - 1]; - - if (att->attnotnull && !att->attisdropped) - { - NullTest *ntest = makeNode(NullTest); - - ntest->arg = (Expr *) makeVar(1, - i, - att->atttypid, - att->atttypmod, - att->attcollation, - 0); - ntest->nulltesttype = IS_NOT_NULL; - - /* - * argisrow=false is correct even for a composite column, - * because attnotnull does not represent a SQL-spec IS NOT - * NULL test in such a case, just IS DISTINCT FROM NULL. - */ - ntest->argisrow = false; - ntest->location = -1; - existConstraint = lappend(existConstraint, ntest); - } - } - } - - for (i = 0; i < num_check; i++) - { - Node *cexpr; - - /* - * If this constraint hasn't been fully validated yet, we must - * ignore it here. - */ - if (!attachrel_constr->check[i].ccvalid) - continue; - - cexpr = stringToNode(attachrel_constr->check[i].ccbin); - - /* - * Run each expression through const-simplification and - * canonicalization. It is necessary, because we will be - * comparing it to similarly-processed qual clauses, and may fail - * to detect valid matches without this. - */ - cexpr = eval_const_expressions(NULL, cexpr); - cexpr = (Node *) canonicalize_qual((Expr *) cexpr); - - existConstraint = list_concat(existConstraint, - make_ands_implicit((Expr *) cexpr)); - } - - existConstraint = list_make1(make_ands_explicit(existConstraint)); - - /* And away we go ... */ - if (predicate_implied_by(partConstraint, existConstraint, true)) - skip_validate = true; - } - - if (skip_validate) + if (PartConstraintImpliedByRelConstraint(attachrel, partConstraint)) { /* No need to scan the table after all. */ ereport(INFO, @@ -13711,9 +13632,18 @@ ATExecAttachPartition(List **wqueue, Relation rel, PartitionCmd *cmd) } else { - /* Constraints proved insufficient, so we need to scan the table. */ ListCell *lc; + /* + * Constraints proved insufficient, so we need to scan the table. + * However, if the table is partitioned, validation scans of the + * individual leaf partitions may still be skipped if they have + * constraints that would make scanning them unnecessary. + * + * Note that attachrel's OID is in the attachrel_children list. Since + * we already determined above that its validation scan cannot be + * skipped, we need not check that again in the loop below. + */ foreach(lc, attachrel_children) { AlteredTableInfo *tab; @@ -13738,6 +13668,10 @@ ATExecAttachPartition(List **wqueue, Relation rel, PartitionCmd *cmd) continue; } + /* + * Check if the partition's existing constraints imply the + * partition constraint and if so, skip the validation scan. + */ if (part_rel != attachrel) { /* @@ -13748,6 +13682,17 @@ ATExecAttachPartition(List **wqueue, Relation rel, PartitionCmd *cmd) my_partconstr = map_partition_varattnos(my_partconstr, 1, part_rel, attachrel); + + if (PartConstraintImpliedByRelConstraint(part_rel, + my_partconstr)) + { + ereport(INFO, + (errmsg("partition constraint for table \"%s\" is implied by existing constraints", + RelationGetRelationName(part_rel)))); + if (part_rel != attachrel) + heap_close(part_rel, NoLock); + continue; + } } /* Grab a work queue entry. */ @@ -13771,6 +13716,87 @@ ATExecAttachPartition(List **wqueue, Relation rel, PartitionCmd *cmd) } /* + * PartConstraintImpliedByRelConstraint + * Does partrel's existing constraints imply the partition constraint? + * + * Existing constraints includes its check constraints and column-level + * NOT NULL constraints and partConstraint describes the partition constraint. + */ +static bool +PartConstraintImpliedByRelConstraint(Relation partrel, List *partConstraint) +{ + List *existConstraint = NIL; + TupleConstr *constr = RelationGetDescr(partrel)->constr; + int num_check, + i; + + if (constr && constr->has_not_null) + { + int natts = partrel->rd_att->natts; + + for (i = 1; i <= natts; i++) + { + Form_pg_attribute att = partrel->rd_att->attrs[i - 1]; + + if (att->attnotnull && !att->attisdropped) + { + NullTest *ntest = makeNode(NullTest); + + ntest->arg = (Expr *) makeVar(1, + i, + att->atttypid, + att->atttypmod, + att->attcollation, + 0); + ntest->nulltesttype = IS_NOT_NULL; + + /* + * argisrow=false is correct even for a composite column, + * because attnotnull does not represent a SQL-spec IS NOT + * NULL test in such a case, just IS DISTINCT FROM NULL. + */ + ntest->argisrow = false; + ntest->location = -1; + existConstraint = lappend(existConstraint, ntest); + } + } + } + + num_check = (constr != NULL) ? constr->num_check : 0; + for (i = 0; i < num_check; i++) + { + Node *cexpr; + + /* + * If this constraint hasn't been fully validated yet, we must + * ignore it here. + */ + if (!constr->check[i].ccvalid) + continue; + + cexpr = stringToNode(constr->check[i].ccbin); + + /* + * Run each expression through const-simplification and + * canonicalization. It is necessary, because we will be comparing + * it to similarly-processed partition constraint expressions, and + * may fail to detect valid matches without this. + */ + cexpr = eval_const_expressions(NULL, cexpr); + cexpr = (Node *) canonicalize_qual((Expr *) cexpr); + + existConstraint = list_concat(existConstraint, + make_ands_implicit((Expr *) cexpr)); + } + + if (existConstraint != NIL) + existConstraint = list_make1(make_ands_explicit(existConstraint)); + + /* And away we go ... */ + return predicate_implied_by(partConstraint, existConstraint, true); +} + +/* * ALTER TABLE DETACH PARTITION * * Return the address of the relation that is no longer a partition of rel. diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/alter_table.out b/src/test/regress/expected/alter_table.out index b727f4bcde..568fb3b2b6 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/expected/alter_table.out +++ b/src/test/regress/expected/alter_table.out @@ -3392,6 +3392,18 @@ SELECT tableoid::regclass, a, b FROM part_7 order by a; ALTER TABLE list_parted2 ATTACH PARTITION part_7 FOR VALUES IN (7); ERROR: partition constraint is violated by some row +-- If the partitioned table being attached does not have a constraint that +-- would allow validation scan to be skipped, but an individual partition +-- does, then the partition's validation scan is skipped. Note that the +-- following leaf partition only allows rows that have a = 7 (and b = 'b' but +-- that's irrelevant). +CREATE TABLE part_7_b PARTITION OF part_7 ( + CONSTRAINT check_a CHECK (a IS NOT NULL AND a = 7) +) FOR VALUES IN ('b'); +-- The faulting row in part_7_a_null will still cause the command to fail +ALTER TABLE list_parted2 ATTACH PARTITION part_7 FOR VALUES IN (7); +INFO: partition constraint for table "part_7_b" is implied by existing constraints +ERROR: partition constraint is violated by some row -- check that the table being attached is not already a partition ALTER TABLE list_parted2 ATTACH PARTITION part_2 FOR VALUES IN (2); ERROR: "part_2" is already a partition diff --git a/src/test/regress/sql/alter_table.sql b/src/test/regress/sql/alter_table.sql index 9a20dd141a..d7dd3b8984 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/sql/alter_table.sql +++ b/src/test/regress/sql/alter_table.sql @@ -2216,6 +2216,17 @@ INSERT INTO part_7 (a, b) VALUES (8, null), (9, 'a'); SELECT tableoid::regclass, a, b FROM part_7 order by a; ALTER TABLE list_parted2 ATTACH PARTITION part_7 FOR VALUES IN (7); +-- If the partitioned table being attached does not have a constraint that +-- would allow validation scan to be skipped, but an individual partition +-- does, then the partition's validation scan is skipped. Note that the +-- following leaf partition only allows rows that have a = 7 (and b = 'b' but +-- that's irrelevant). +CREATE TABLE part_7_b PARTITION OF part_7 ( + CONSTRAINT check_a CHECK (a IS NOT NULL AND a = 7) +) FOR VALUES IN ('b'); +-- The faulting row in part_7_a_null will still cause the command to fail +ALTER TABLE list_parted2 ATTACH PARTITION part_7 FOR VALUES IN (7); + -- check that the table being attached is not already a partition ALTER TABLE list_parted2 ATTACH PARTITION part_2 FOR VALUES IN (2); -- 2.11.0