From 3ce5376868f61a67540915b83a15c59a31fc895a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Euler Taveira Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2015 13:49:37 -0300 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] fix some typos. --- src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c b/src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c index da0b70e..16d8c59 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c @@ -2250,7 +2250,7 @@ heap_prepare_insert(Relation relation, HeapTuple tup, TransactionId xid, /* * For now, parallel operations are required to be strictly read-only. * Unlike heap_update() and heap_delete(), an insert should never create - * a combo CID, so it might be possible to relax this restrction, but + * a combo CID, so it might be possible to relax this restriction, but * not without more thought and testing. */ if (IsInParallelMode()) @@ -2666,7 +2666,7 @@ heap_delete(Relation relation, ItemPointer tid, Assert(ItemPointerIsValid(tid)); /* - * Forbid this during a parallel operation, lest it allocate a combocid. + * Forbid this during a parallel operation, lets it allocate a combocid. * Other workers might need that combocid for visibility checks, and we * have no provision for broadcasting it to them. */ @@ -3124,7 +3124,7 @@ heap_update(Relation relation, ItemPointer otid, HeapTuple newtup, Assert(ItemPointerIsValid(otid)); /* - * Forbid this during a parallel operation, lest it allocate a combocid. + * Forbid this during a parallel operation, lets it allocate a combocid. * Other workers might need that combocid for visibility checks, and we * have no provision for broadcasting it to them. */ @@ -5435,7 +5435,7 @@ heap_inplace_update(Relation relation, HeapTuple tuple) /* * For now, parallel operations are required to be strictly read-only. * Unlike a regular update, this should never create a combo CID, so it - * might be possible to relax this restrction, but not without more + * might be possible to relax this restriction, but not without more * thought and testing. It's not clear that it would be useful, anyway. */ if (IsInParallelMode()) -- 2.1.4