From 597c0812811609b8cecaccd992a40457f04f4aa4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vignesh C Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2026 10:07:11 +0530 Subject: [PATCH v3 1/3] Reject concurrent sequence refreshes 'ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... REFRESH SEQUENCES' can race with an already running sequence synchronization worker. If a second refresh request resets the synchronization state while the worker has already fetched sequence values from the publisher but has not yet applied them to the subscriber, the worker can overwrite the subscriber with stale values and mark the synchronization as complete. Avoid this race by rejecting 'ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... REFRESH SEQUENCES' when a sequence synchronization worker is already running for the subscription. The command reports an error asking the user to rerun it after the current synchronization completes. Also add a wait for the re-added 'regress_s4' sequence to finish synchronizing in 036_sequences.pl, so the subsequent test does not race against its sequencesync worker. --- src/backend/commands/subscriptioncmds.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ src/test/subscription/t/036_sequences.pl | 4 ++++ 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/subscriptioncmds.c b/src/backend/commands/subscriptioncmds.c index 4292e7fb8f4..48f4ff05d83 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/subscriptioncmds.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/subscriptioncmds.c @@ -1363,6 +1363,32 @@ AlterSubscription_refresh_seq(Subscription *sub) WalReceiverConn *wrconn; bool must_use_password; + /* + * Disallow a concurrent REFRESH SEQUENCES while a sequence sync worker + * for this subscription is still running. This avoids a race where the + * publisher's sequence advances after the current worker has fetched its + * value but before it marks the sequence READY. A user may then issue + * another REFRESH SEQUENCES to synchronize the updated value. Since the + * affected sequences are already in the INIT state, the running worker + * has no indication that a new synchronization has been requested. It + * would then apply the stale value it already fetched and mark the + * sequence READY, causing the new synchronization request to be lost and + * preventing the updated publisher values from being synchronized. + */ + LWLockAcquire(LogicalRepWorkerLock, LW_SHARED); + if (logicalrep_worker_find(WORKERTYPE_SEQUENCESYNC, sub->oid, InvalidOid, + true)) + { + LWLockRelease(LogicalRepWorkerLock); + ereport(ERROR, + errcode(ERRCODE_OBJECT_NOT_IN_PREREQUISITE_STATE), + errmsg("cannot execute %s while a sequence synchronization worker is running", + "ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... REFRESH SEQUENCES"), + errhint("Try again after the current synchronization completes.")); + } + + LWLockRelease(LogicalRepWorkerLock); + /* Load the library providing us libpq calls. */ load_file("libpqwalreceiver", false); diff --git a/src/test/subscription/t/036_sequences.pl b/src/test/subscription/t/036_sequences.pl index 2a0819aaf01..8b02b24a7e9 100644 --- a/src/test/subscription/t/036_sequences.pl +++ b/src/test/subscription/t/036_sequences.pl @@ -232,6 +232,10 @@ $node_publisher->safe_psql( CREATE SEQUENCE regress_s4 START 10 INCREMENT 2; )); +# Wait for the missing sequence added to be synced +$node_subscriber->poll_query_until('postgres', $synced_query) + or die "Timed out while waiting for subscriber to synchronize data"; + ########## # Ensure that insufficient privileges on the publisher for a sequence # are reported correctly as a permission issue, not as a missing sequence. -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)