From c426251927410e80eec4c42ff60b802b616b15a3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Eisentraut Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 11:35:16 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 5/5] Fix additional fallthrough warning Clang warns about this one, but GCC did not. (Apparently a bug in GCC: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122796) Apparently, the previous "fall through" comment was introduced manually in commit f76892c9ff7e without the compiler actually asking for it. --- src/bin/scripts/reindexdb.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/bin/scripts/reindexdb.c b/src/bin/scripts/reindexdb.c index b15745256ff..8bab74b5917 100644 --- a/src/bin/scripts/reindexdb.c +++ b/src/bin/scripts/reindexdb.c @@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ reindex_one_database(ConnParams *cparams, ReindexType type, { case REINDEX_SCHEMA: Assert(user_list != NULL); - /* fall through */ + pg_fallthrough; case REINDEX_DATABASE: -- 2.52.0