From 239be70853039067f1408c0e46f18a6888403275 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tomas Vondra Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 14:57:05 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v20250310e 3/4] pgindent --- src/backend/postmaster/datachecksumsworker.c | 13 +++++++------ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksumsworker.c b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksumsworker.c index d9833cd4c98..6a201dca8de 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksumsworker.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/datachecksumsworker.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(bool immediate_checkpoint) PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_BLOCKS_DONE, }; - int64 vals[6]; + int64 vals[6]; vals[0] = list_length(DatabaseList); vals[1] = 0; @@ -974,7 +974,8 @@ ProcessAllDatabases(bool immediate_checkpoint) processed_databases++; /* - * Update the number of processed databases in the progress report. + * Update the number of processed databases in the progress + * report. */ pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_DBS_DONE, processed_databases); @@ -1126,9 +1127,9 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerShmemInit(void) MemSet(DataChecksumsWorkerShmem, 0, DataChecksumsWorkerShmemSize()); /* - * Even if this is a redundant assignment, we want to be explicit about - * our intent for readability, since we want to be able to query this - * state in case of restartability. + * Even if this is a redundant assignment, we want to be explicit + * about our intent for readability, since we want to be able to query + * this state in case of restartability. */ DataChecksumsWorkerShmem->launch_enable_checksums = false; DataChecksumsWorkerShmem->launcher_running = false; @@ -1339,7 +1340,7 @@ DataChecksumsWorkerMain(Datum arg) PROGRESS_DATACHECKSUMS_RELS_DONE }; - int64 vals[2]; + int64 vals[2]; vals[0] = list_length(RelationList); vals[1] = 0; -- 2.48.1