Re: Curious buildfarm failures (fwd)

From: Sergey Koposov <koposov(at)ast(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Curious buildfarm failures (fwd)
Date: 2013-01-16 15:03:52
Message-ID: alpine.LRH.2.03.1301161446170.11753@ast.cam.ac.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 16 Jan 2013, Andres Freund wrote:
>> So unless somebody suggest otherwise, i'm going to switch to gcc on this
>> buildfarm.
>
> What about switching to -O1 of 11.1?

I don't know. It is up to -hackers to decide. I think that icc on ia64
have shown bugginess time after time. But if you think that buildfarm
with icc 11.1 -O1 carry more information than say running gcc, i can
still run icc.

S

*****************************************************
Sergey E. Koposov, PhD, Research Associate
Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge
Madingley road, CB3 0HA, Cambridge, UK
Tel: +44-1223-337-551 Web: http://www.ast.cam.ac.uk/~koposov/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2013-01-16 15:08:33 Re: log_lock_waits to identify transaction's relation
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2013-01-16 14:56:20 Re: Curious buildfarm failures (fwd)