Re: pgbench progress with timestamp

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgbench progress with timestamp
Date: 2015-09-09 08:35:53
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.10.1509091030001.3177@sto
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> In the sgml, second should be plural in 'intead of the number of second
> since the'. And 'intead' should be 'instead'.

Ok.

> --progress-timestamp use a Unix-like epoch timestamp for progress
> reporting
>
> but that is getting pretty long.

Indeed. I've done:

--progress-timestamp use Unix epoch timestamps in ms for progress

Here is a v2.

--
Fabien.

Attachment Content-Type Size
pgbench-progress-timestamp-2.patch text/x-diff 3.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2015-09-09 08:46:52 Re: On-demand running query plans using auto_explain and signals
Previous Message Shulgin, Oleksandr 2015-09-09 08:22:02 Re: On-demand running query plans using auto_explain and signals