Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgsql-jdbc/pgsql-odbc

From: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres-Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, the6campbells <the6campbells(at)gmail(dot)com>, goldenhawking(at)vip(dot)163(dot)com
Subject: Re: pgsql-jdbc/pgsql-odbc
Date: 2009-11-19 03:28:51
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, Tom Lane wrote:

> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I see that there's been no response to bugs #5194, #5187, #5051.
>> Should we consider adding a message to the bug reporting page that
>> suggests emailing the relevant list directly for JDBC/ODBC bugs?
> +1.  Either that or somebody takes responsibility for forwarding
> bug reports, which might be nicer but I don't know who would want
> to do it.

I do read -bugs and try to follow up on all JDBC bug reports.  Notably 
none of the above referenced bug numbers are JDBC problems.  I think the 
problem is trying to determine what projects in the entire postgresql 
ecosystem deserve special mention on the bug reporting page.

Surely there must be at least one ODBC person subscribed to -bugs.  What 
about just asking them to be more responsive even if they don't have a 

Kris Jurka

In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Joseph ShraibmanDate: 2009-11-19 04:26:13
Subject: BUG #5197: JDBC: selecting oid results in Exception
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-11-19 03:20:00
Subject: Re: pgsql-jdbc/pgsql-odbc

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group