From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_basebackup ignores the existing data directory permissions |
Date: | 2019-03-22 15:23:14 |
Message-ID: | a70fbbd5-f0dc-2826-4850-4ec819023086@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-03-22 05:00, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 02:45:24PM +1100, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
>> How about letting the pg_basebackup to decide group permissions of the
>> standby directory irrespective of the primary directory permissions.
>>
>> Default - permissions are same as primary
>> --allow-group-access - standby directory have group access permissions
>> --no-group--access - standby directory doesn't have group permissions
>>
>> The last two options behave irrespective of the primary directory
>> permissions.
>
> Yes, I'd imagine that we would want to be able to define three
> different behaviors, by either having a set of options, or a sinple
> option with a switch, say --group-access:
> - "inherit" causes the permissions to be inherited from the source
> node, and that's the default.
> - "none" enforces the default 0700/0600.
> - "group" enforces group read access.
Yes, we could use those three behaviors.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2019-03-22 15:27:24 | Re: [proposal] Add an option for returning SQLSTATE in psql error message |
Previous Message | Christoph Berg | 2019-03-22 15:16:54 | Enable data checksums by default |