Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PG does not use my index

From: Federico <rotellaro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Rickard Sjöström <rickard(dot)sjostrom(at)bluebottle(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PG does not use my index
Date: 2007-04-02 15:08:26
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-admin
On 4/2/07, Rickard Sjöström <rickard(dot)sjostrom(at)bluebottle(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi!
> This post is related to the post "Performance of views" but this is another problem now.
> Problem: PostgreSQL seems to not use my index.
> My postgres is 7.4.
> I started all over again and got my query really fast on one database (~40 seconds became 150 ms). BUT when trying on another db (same postgres server but with approx. 4 times as much data) it was really slow again (say 10 seconds).
> Then I run the EXPLAIN ANALYSE of a sub-query of my query which I realize was the problem.
> It seems that it does not make use of the index in the slower database!?
> fast db:
> -------------------------
>  ->  Index Scan using testcase_b_bid_index on testcase  (cost=0.00..1656.82 rows=426 width=38) (never executed)"
> -------------------------
> slow db:
> -------------------------
> ->  Seq Scan on testcase  (cost=0.00..2896.42 rows=33242 width=64) (actual time=77.027..791.014 rows=37093 loops=1)"
> -------------------------
> rows=37093 is all of the existing rows of table testcase!
> (why does it say "never executed"?)

a full index scan is even more expensive than a sequential scan.
So the query optimizer works fine.


In response to

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Bill MoranDate: 2007-04-02 15:32:22
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Increasing the shared memory
Previous:From: Shoaib MirDate: 2007-04-02 15:01:50
Subject: Re: Increasing the shared memory

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group