Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Bolder vision of pg certification

From: "Santiago Zarate" <santiago(at)zarate(dot)net(dot)ve>
To: "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Andrew Sullivan" <ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Bolder vision of pg certification
Date: 2008-05-08 04:36:48
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
There was a discussion some time ago on advocacy and included -general
at some time... and these interested... got involved on it (the cert
list) and there werent  that many... (i've seen only like 10~ persons
arround), so calling -general... i dont see why... may be putting a
link on the site for the comunity to see and or
participate on the cert stuff... but... it would then... make more and
more people go on the list... and well IMHO, in Venezuela we say that
many hands on the food... makes the food taste bad...

2008/5/8 Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>:
> On Wednesday 07 May 2008 11:20:28 Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>  > On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 03:03:20PM -0000, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
>  > > Got a link to said archives?
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > > > In any case, this discussion belongs on the other list.
>  > >
>  > > I think general discussions about certification belong on this list,
>  > > certainly seems the best list of those listed here:
>  >
>  > I thought the _previous_ round of discussion around this determined
>  > that it was its own project, going on over there, and therefore should
>  > have its own list.  Since it has its own list, the discussion belongs
>  > there (for the same reason that bucardo and slony related performance
>  > problems don't go on -performance).
>  >
>  Ah, but what is at the heart of the original posters email? It sounds to me
>  like they don't want to discuss the communities current effort (the slony in
>  your example), but want to discuss the idea of doing certification with a
>  different model (ie. let's say the topic of synchronus replication, again
>  following your example).  If that's the case I see nothing wrong with
>  discussing that here, except to the extent it isn't an advocacy related
>  topic, it might be worth discussing on -general instead.
>  --
>  Robert Treat
>  Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
>  --
>  Sent via pgsql-advocacy mailing list (pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>  To make changes to your subscription:

In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Mudy SitumorangDate: 2008-05-08 06:30:13
Subject: Re: Bolder vision of pg certification
Previous:From: Santiago ZarateDate: 2008-05-08 04:30:17
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL users and admins Linkedin Group

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group