Re: compile bug in HEAD?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: compile bug in HEAD?
Date: 2002-03-28 00:56:15
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0203271955040.690-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Neil Conway writes:

> I'm curious; why is this "not the right fix"? According to the manpage:
>
> -l turns on maximum compatibility with the original
> AT&T lex implementation. Note that this does not
> mean full compatibility. Use of this option
> costs a considerable amount of performance...

The manpage also lists the specific incompatibilities. I think we should
not be affected by them, but someone better check before removing the -l.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-03-28 01:20:30 Re: Mailing List Question
Previous Message Neil Conway 2002-03-27 23:53:53 Re: compile bug in HEAD?