Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: ALTER TABLE OWNER: change indexes

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>,PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE OWNER: change indexes
Date: 2002-03-11 01:45:24
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0203102044340.684-100000@peter.localdomain (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian writes:

> OK, I propose that we do the index part of this patch too.  No one seems
> to know if seting the index user id to zero in pg_class will break
> things so we may as keep it consistent.  Can you send that over?

What would it break?  Joins against pg_user should use outer joins anyway.
I don't think this is the right direction.  It's just a waste of code.

Peter Eisentraut   peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to


pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-03-11 02:19:39
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE OWNER: change indexes
Previous:From: Michael MeskesDate: 2002-03-10 14:39:06
Subject: Re: Additional fixes to ecpg - please apply patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group