Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Patch to add Heimdal kerberos support

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bill Studenmund <wrstuden(at)netbsd(dot)org>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch to add Heimdal kerberos support
Date: 2001-11-14 16:24:38
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0111141649490.639-100000@peter.localdomain (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
Tom Lane writes:

> Couldn't we do this in a way that doesn't require a user configure switch?

We've seen a Heimdal patch before that had the same source changes but
solved the configury in some other ugly way.  It's not trivial to write a
macro that checks for struct members.  However, that other patch didn't
need to link in all these extra libraries as this patch tries; it only
used -lkrb5.  There is only one Heimdal I trust?

Peter Eisentraut   peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to


pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2001-11-14 16:25:07
Subject: Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2001-11-14 16:24:09
Subject: Re: Patch to add Heimdal kerberos support

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group