Re: compiling pg 7.0.3 on sco 5.0.5

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Billy G(dot) Allie" <bga(at)mug(dot)org>, "Arno A(dot) Karner" <karner(at)tnss(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: compiling pg 7.0.3 on sco 5.0.5
Date: 2000-12-04 17:31:17
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0012041825180.787-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane writes:

> I ask because we recently pulled "#define DISABLE_COMPLEX_MACRO" from
> port/sco.h, on the grounds that various people were seeing more harm
> than good from it. But I'm suddenly wondering whether those people
> might've been using gcc.

We can be fairly certain that they weren't, unless GCC started accepting
SCO's compiler flags (or someone altered the compiler flags and filed a
*very* incomplete bug report).

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ross J. Reedstrom 2000-12-04 17:33:07 Re: Using Threads?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-12-04 17:24:29 Re: Postgresql on dynix/ptx system