Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: SGVLLUG Oracle and Informix on Linux]

From: Chris Johnson <cmj(at)inline-design(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: SGVLLUG Oracle and Informix on Linux]
Date: 1998-07-27 21:06:25
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.00.9807271702570.30845-100000@boreus.bedfo.ma.tiac.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

> > > Let's remove the "I don't want to think" utilities like
> > >{create,destroy}{db,user} and force DBA's to actually use the *proper*
> > >functions.

IMHO (actually make that IMVeryHO) This is probably a bad idea... We
should just update the man pages to detail the SQL code that can be used
instead of the command. It doesn't hurt anything/anyone to leave the
programs as they are, and can even be helpful to people writing scripts to
automate management of their servers.

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Johnson 1998-07-27 21:14:53 Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: SGVLLUG Oracle and Informix on Linux]
Previous Message James Olin Oden 1998-07-27 18:23:33 Re: [GENERAL] Postgres vs commercial products

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Tong 1998-07-27 21:30:16 Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: SGVLLUG Oracle and Informix on Linux]
Previous Message Vadim Mikheev 1998-07-27 20:31:38 Re: [HACKERS] Q about read committed in Oracle...