Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Deadlock with tsearch2 index ...

From: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>,pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Deadlock with tsearch2 index ...
Date: 2005-05-31 22:22:18
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 31 May 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
> The real solution is to upgrade GIST to be concurrent.  Oleg and Teodor
> have made some noises about that in the past, but nothing's been done
> about it that I've heard of.

unfortunately, we still couldn't find 2-3 months for dedicated work on
concurrency&recovery for GiST. I'm trying to find support here in Russia
for our work.

> 			regards, tom lane
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
>    (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)

Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
Internet: oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su,
phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2005-05-31 22:26:11
Subject: Physical Tlist optimization still possible?
Previous:From: Joe ConwayDate: 2005-05-31 22:02:00
Subject: Re: [SQL] ARRAY() returning NULL instead of ARRAY[] resp.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group