Re: [HACKERS] More detail on settings for pgavd?

From: Chester Kustarz <chester(at)arbor(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] More detail on settings for pgavd?
Date: 2003-11-20 20:54:24
Message-ID: Pine.BSO.4.44.0311201552360.19584-100000@detroit.arbor.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> Those claims cannot both be true. In any case, plain vacuum cannot grow
> the indexes --- only a VACUUM FULL that moves a significant number of
> rows could cause index growth.

er, yeah. you're right of course. having flashbacks of vacuum full.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-11-20 21:08:28 Re: 7.4 logging bug.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-11-20 20:38:05 Re: Release cycle length

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message stephen farrell 2003-11-20 21:04:29 Problem with insert into select...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-11-20 19:20:24 Re: [HACKERS] More detail on settings for pgavd?