Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] More detail on settings for pgavd?

From: Chester Kustarz <chester(at)arbor(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>,<pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>,PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] More detail on settings for pgavd?
Date: 2003-11-20 20:54:24
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-performance
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> Those claims cannot both be true.  In any case, plain vacuum cannot grow
> the indexes --- only a VACUUM FULL that moves a significant number of
> rows could cause index growth.

er, yeah. you're right of course. having flashbacks of vacuum full.

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: stephen farrellDate: 2003-11-20 21:04:29
Subject: Problem with insert into select...
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-11-20 19:20:24
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] More detail on settings for pgavd?

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-11-20 21:08:28
Subject: Re: 7.4 logging bug.
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-11-20 20:38:05
Subject: Re: Release cycle length

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group