Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] patches for 6.2.1p6

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Massimo Dal Zotto <dz(at)cs(dot)unitn(dot)it>, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] patches for 6.2.1p6
Date: 1998-03-20 23:27:52
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 20 Mar 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > I'am against a generic patch using select(). If we have sched_yield() on an
> > architecture I don't see why dont't use it. Here is the patch for Linux.
> > It has been tested for two months by 100 users without any problem.
> > The only thing I would add is a more general configuration test in configure
> > to include the proper include files.
> I understand your issue.  Unfortunately, only Linux has sched_yield(),
> as far as I know.  Perhaps we can implement sched_yield/select based on
> the platform.  

	What's the possibility of doing this similar to how we do some of
the other functions (dl_open comes immediately to mind)...make a
pg_sched_yield function and use that, which is built based on the various

	Right now, I don't believe we have *anything* in place, so have
pg_sched_yield() return 0 (or an equivalent) for every platform except for

Marc G. Fournier                                
Systems Administrator @ 
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org           secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org 

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: The Hermit HackerDate: 1998-03-20 23:57:34
Subject: Newest Patch...try this one...
Previous:From: The Hermit HackerDate: 1998-03-20 23:25:09
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] tonight's mega-patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group