Re: prepareable statements

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Neil Conway" <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL Patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: prepareable statements
Date: 2002-07-01 01:31:55
Message-ID: GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOAENOCCAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

> The syntax is largely SQL92 compliant, but not totally. I'm not sure how
> the SQL spec expects parameters to be set up in PREPARE, but I doubt
> it's the same way I used. And the SQL92 spec for EXECUTE is functionally
> similar, but uses a different syntax (EXECUTE ... USING INTO <rel>, I
> think). If someone can decipher the spec on these two points and
> can suggest what the proper syntax should be, let me know.

I'll have a read of the spec for you to see if I can decode something out of
it! I think it's pretty essential we have full standard compliance on this
one!

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Curt Sampson 2002-07-01 02:50:14 Re: [PATCHES] Reduce heap tuple header size
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 2002-06-30 16:24:05 english doc for tree module

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Curt Sampson 2002-07-01 02:50:14 Re: [PATCHES] Reduce heap tuple header size
Previous Message Neil Conway 2002-06-30 00:35:37 SQL99 doc update