Re: table OCX control

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: 'Tim Finch' <pgadmin(at)timfinch(dot)cix(dot)co(dot)uk>, "Mark A(dot) Taff" <mark(at)libertycreek(dot)net>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: table OCX control
Date: 2002-03-08 20:02:01
Message-ID: FED2B709E3270E4B903EB0175A49BCB1047680@dogbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Finch [mailto:pgadmin(at)timfinch(dot)cix(dot)co(dot)uk]
> Sent: 08 March 2002 11:54
> To: Mark A. Taff
> Cc: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] table OCX control
>
>
> You're right, Yes it should and no its not. Now to this end,
> whats the gas
> on us using commercially available OCX controls. I have a
> legal bought copy
> of VSView, which contains an OCX that is a 'scrollable pane'
> - it takes
> care of all that side of things. There are no financial
> licensing issues
> with distributing it, but the problem of course is its
> unlikely you guys
> have a developer's license for it... Thought I'd ask.

No commercial controls thank you. Standard redistributable Microsoft ones,
or our own only. Too many licencing and compatibility problems otherwise.

Regards, Dave.

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2002-03-08 20:10:53 Re: Wine..?
Previous Message Tim Finch, FosterFinch Ltd 2002-03-08 11:57:44 CVS, MArk & Tim testing